Prediction of Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Thomas Fabbiano Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
B. Van De Zandschulp vs T. Fabbiano

Botic Van De Zandschulp

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

5'8" (173 cm)

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

$1.3M

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Thomas Fabbiano

ITA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'2" (188 cm)

Height

5'8" (173 cm)

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.7M

Career Money

$1.3M

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Fabbiano

They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Thomas Fabbiano winning 0. The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Thomas Fabbiano was at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha, 14-02-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-2 7-6(5).

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Zandschulp	1
Fabbiano	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha(02-14-22)

Stats

Botic Van De Zandschulp

Thomas Fabbiano

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs T. Fabbiano H2H Profile

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	T. Fabbiano
$3,738,275	Career Prize Money	$1,279,588
60.93% (382-245)	Career Total W/L	54.90% (521-428)
1	Hard	0
7	Titles	18
1	Total H2H Matches	0
44.44% (16-20)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs T. Fabbiano Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 44.61% of points on their second serve, while Thomas Fabbiano has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Botic Van De Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.32% of their opponent's second serve points, while Thomas Fabbiano has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.63% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 55.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Thomas Fabbiano has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 49.21% of matches played (W/L 31/32), with Thomas Fabbiano winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 97/59), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/15). Thomas Fabbiano has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 219/136), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 45/57).
Player level: In the last year, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 51.35% of matches (W/L 19/18), where as Thomas Fabbiano has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 1 times and Thomas Fabbiano being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 2 and Thomas Fabbiano winning 0.
The last match between Botic Van De Zandschulp and Thomas Fabbiano was at the Qatar ExxonMobil Open - Doha, 14-02-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-2 7-6(5).
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:37.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 137.83 while Thomas Fabbiano has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Thomas Fabbiano has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 30.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Thomas Fabbiano has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Thomas Fabbiano Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs T. Fabbiano H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	T. Fabbiano
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	8
6	Aces (Total)	0
4	Total Double Faults	2
1:32:37	Average Match Time	1:32:37
64% (39/61)	1st Serve %	70% (47/67)
74% (29/39)	1st Serve Win %	62% (29/47)
55% (12/22)	2nd Serve Win %	40% (8/20)
57% (4/7)	Break Pts Won %	67% (2/3)
45% (30/67)	Return Points Win %	33% (20/61)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris - 27-10-2025
Q3 Ethan QuinnE. Quinn	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
Q1 Jenson BrooksbyJ. Brooksby	W	4-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel - 20-10-2025
R2 Reilly OpelkaR. Opelka	L	7-6(5) 6-7(7) 6-3	Stats
R1 Jiri LeheckaJ. Lehecka	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
Q3 Reilly OpelkaR. Opelka	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

T. Fabbiano Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Zug Challenger - 25-07-2022
R1 Ugo BlanchetU. Blanchet	L	4-6 6-3 6-2	Stats
M25+H Kassel - 11-07-2022
R2 Rudolf MollekerR. Molleker	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
R1 Michael AgwiM. Agwi	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Wimbledon - London - 27-06-2022
Q1 Arthur FeryA. Fery	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
cinch Championships - London - 13-06-2022
Q3 Sam QuerreyS. Querrey	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

B. V. D. Zandschulp vs T. Fabbiano Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

B. V. D. Zandschulp	Stats	T. Fabbiano
60.93% (382/245)	YTD Win/Loss	54.90% (521/428)
57.89% (873/635)	Sets Win/Loss	53.29% (1207/1058)
52.98% (7578/6726)	Games Win/Loss	51.41% (10971/10369)
57.81% (74/54)	Hard Win/Loss	61.69% (219/136)
61.59% (178/111)	Clay Win/Loss	52.13% (220/202)
64.48% (118/65)	Indoor Hard W/L	43.97% (51/65)
44.44% (12/15)	Grass Win/Loss	55.36% (31/25)
0.45	Aces Per Game	0.12
3126	Aces Total	1275
0.33	Double Faults Per Game	0.17
2293	Total Double Faults	1816
1:36:52	Average Match Time	1:2:57
391.11	Average Opponent Rank	587.45
62% (25735/41799)	1st Serve %	64% (29337/45970)
72% (18450/25735)	1st Serve Win %	66% (19219/29337)
48% (7736/16067)	2nd Serve Win %	51% (8451/16630)
43% (1879/4378)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (1959/4733)
41% (17501/43211)	Return Points Win %	40% (18409/45934)
58.93% (33/23)	Slam W/L	49.32% (36/37)
48.21% (27/29)	Masters W/L	35.71% (15/27)
60.00% (12/8)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
51.63% (79/74)	Main Tour W/L	44.44% (68/85)
63.33% (76/44)	Challenger W/L	53.21% (249/219)
69.82% (155/67)	Futures W/L	72.17% (153/59)
62% (354/571)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (499/910)
49% (21/43)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	48% (15/31)
53% (108/204)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	48% (140/293)
57% (117/205)	Deciding Set Win %	53% (175/331)
89% (358/319)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (497/414)
11% (358/38)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	17% (497/83)
23% (267/62)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (452/106)